Ticket #108 (new enhancement)
No support for infix operator definitions
|Reported by:||benl||Owned by:||steggles|
We don't support infix definitions like:
f ++ g = ...
All operators must be define in prefix style like:
(++) f g = ...
I'm not sure it's a good idea to support the infix definition style, because GHC had problems with it when they introduced bang patterns. For example:
f ! x = ...
It that supposed to be a definition of the operator (!) or, the definition of a function "f" which is strict in its argument?
We may well want to support bang patterns or something similar in the future, so we're avoiding infix definitions for now.