id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,priority,milestone,component,resolution,keywords,cc
21,Clarify web sites,dons,,"We have policy and advice distributed across 3 sites now:

 * the download page
 * the haskell.org wiki page
 * the haskell trac page

My current view is that the haskell.org page is now redundant.
What we should have instead is:

 * hackage.haskell.org/platform   <=> http://www.gnome.org/  (i.e. home for the user-facing project
 * the trac wiki <=> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning (i.e. dev facing page)


{{{
dcoutts> dons: after 2009.2.x the next major release is 2009.4.x
dcoutts> http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/wiki/VersionNumbers
dcoutts> dons: btw, we need to sort out the various wikis
dcoutts> the one on haskell.org should be for users I think
dcoutts> the one that's part of the trac for developers, meaning
         package maintainers and also release engineering team
dcoutts> but we should make a clear section for info for package
         maintainers
dcoutts> with info on schedules, dates, expectations, policies
dcoutts> and not clutter that section with stuff that's only of
         interest to the release engineering team
dcoutts> dons: seem a reasonable organisation principle?
dcoutts> dons: so policies decided by the libs list would generally
         go in the trac wiki
}}}
",defect,closed,major,2009.2.0.1,(none-specified),fixed,,
